Reactions to the Springer Survey in Ancient Egypt and Meena's Tomb 

As I delved into the article, I was truly captivated by the stunning images of the tomb and the incredible precision that characterized the artwork within the tomb of Meena. The extensive historical depictions made me reflect on their significance. Are these intricate illustrations a testament to his esteemed position, showcasing his role as a political leader? Or do they serve to highlight his major contributions to Egypt during that remarkable era? I wonder, do the detailed drawings represent his administrative role, or do they instead illustrate the level of accuracy in measurements achieved during that time?  

My second question concerns the historical use of the forearm as a standard unit of measurement during that period. What specific criteria were employed to apply this measurement, considering that individual forearm dimensions can vary significantly? I am curious about how this variation was addressed and standardized for consistency in measurement practices.  

Finally, what surprised me most was the remen as highlighted in the Springer article: “A remarkable additional unit was the remen, defined as half the diameter of a square with sides of one royal cubit in length. The length of this diameter is cubits, which cannot be written as the sum of reciprocal fractions (such as), the notation system used in Ancient Egypt, but only as an unending decimal fraction (like). A remen would be about 371 mm (14.6 in.) or, by coincidence, almost exactly 19.5 fingers. The advantage of the remen was that it allowed areas of land to be halved or doubled while preserving the proportions simply by changing the unit. A square with sides of a cubit, for instance, has twice the area of a square with sides of a remen and half the area of a square with sides of two remen (a ‘double‐remen’). To calculate the area of a circle, π (pi) was approximated as (2 × (1 − 1/9))² = 16 2/9² = 256/81, which equals approximately 3.16049... (whereas the correct value of π = 3.14159...).”  

I was profoundly struck by the remarkable level of precision achieved and its astonishing proximity to the true value of π (pi). This observation underscores the notion that mathematics is not merely a contemporary construct, but rather a timeless discipline that has been woven into the fabric of human understanding for centuries. 

Comments

  1. MaliheSeptember 24, 2025 at 1:55 PM

    You connected the artwork, measurement systems, and the surprising precision of π in a very thoughtful way. I wonder how reflecting on these practices might change how we view the relationship between mathematics, culture, and power in ancient societies.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Image
    The Big Idea About the One and Two Pan Scale Puzzle The principle of the two-pan scale is based on the idea of mass equality, whereby the weight on one side must exactly match the weight on the other for the scale to achieve balance. This system is particularly fascinating because it allows for a variety of weights to be represented through combinations of smaller weights, especially when utilizing powers of 3, such as 1 gram, 3 grams, 9 grams, and 27 grams, which measure any number from 1 to 40. The two-pan scale operates using a balanced ternary system, which incorporates three distinct digits: -1, 0, and +1. In this context, 0 signifies that a weight is not used, -1 indicates that the weight is placed on the same side as the item being weighed, and +1 shows that the weight is on the opposite side. This arrangement facilitates efficient calculations and gives room for instinctive calculations. For instance, if a customer asks for 7 grams of herbs, I can explore h...
Read more
During my undergraduate studies, I engaged deeply with courses and literature on the integration of history in education. I strongly believe that introducing the historical context of mathematical concepts in lessons is essential, as it humanizes these often abstract ideas, making them more accessible and relatable. I recall my time teaching mathematics back home, where students would express their frustration with statements like, “I wonder who invented Mathematics?” or “Who is subjecting us to this torment?” It often felt like the subject had a wicked inventor who sought to impose unnecessary challenges on them. However integrating the development of mathematical concepts into my teaching, will help students recognize that these scholars made significant contributions to this field in response to real-life challenges, and they faced struggles similar to their own in the pursuit of knowledge, and when students realize that mathematics didn't simply appear but instead evolved throu...
Read more
Speculative Phase  I believe the Babylonians' selection of 60 as a base system is closely linked to their understanding of time. This is evident in the modern SI unit of time, which is structured as follows:  60 seconds equal 1 minute, and  60 minutes equal 1 hour  This connection suggests that the origins of our current timekeeping system may trace back to Babylonian practices. Furthermore, this base-60 system aligns closely with the number of days in a calendar year, which is typically 365 or 366 days. This is also surprisingly close to 360 degrees, which is connected particularly in the context of Earth’s meridians and lines of latitude and longitude. These lines are instrumental in how humanity has learned to measure time and assess the Earth's position. I firmly believe that the Babylonians were pioneers in developing the time system we utilize today. During our last class on Monday, we explored the fascinating concept of representing fractions in base 60. This ...
Read more