THE HISTORY OF MATHEMATICS AND HOW IT RELATES TO US
While reading the article “The Genre of Mathematics
Education” by Susan Gerofsky, certain aspects stood out to me. One of them is
from the quote that “On account of the superficial 'everyday' quality to the
stories and the fact that the scribal schools were vocational training
institutions, Babylonian mathematics has been characterized as 'merely
practical' as opposed to later Greek abstract, theoretical mathematics.” This
highlights the aspect of practicality in mathematics.
Through my teaching experiences with students both back home
and in Canada, I’ve observed that many of them struggle with word problems,
despite being presented in the same English they use in their literacy classes.
This difficulty often arises from a lack of active engagement in practical
experiences. I firmly believe that incorporating field trips into the
mathematics curriculum could significantly enhance learning. By providing
opportunities for students to explore locations such as malls, markets, train
stations and plots of land, they can witness firsthand how concepts from their
lessons apply in the real world. For example, while observing land measurement
by surveyors, they will understand how it works. Participating in these
hands-on activities would help students bridge the gap between textbook
knowledge and practical application, ultimately leading to a deeper
understanding and greater proficiency in solving word problems.
While reflecting on the concluding part of the article, a
question caught my attention: “Are word problems used primarily to train
students in the use of methods without necessarily providing an understanding
of those methods?” This made me think critically about the typical structure of
mathematics textbook questions. Often, we find examples followed by numerous
practice problems. While it's commonly said that increased practice leads to
stronger mathematicians, I wonder if this truly fosters deep conceptual
understanding or if it merely encourages students to memorize and replicate
steps to solve various problems.
To address this concern, I believe it's essential for
students to articulate how their questions and solutions relate to their
everyday experiences. Encouraging them to share these connections can
significantly enhance their grasp of mathematical concepts. Furthermore,
integrating role-playing elements into lessons, where both teachers and
students embody the narratives behind the problems, could make the learning
experience more engaging and enjoyable. By incorporating gestures and drama,
mathematics could transform into a more dynamic and relatable subject,
fostering a deeper appreciation and understanding among students.
Finally, the structure of language construction shares
similarities with both Babylonian and modern mathematics, which can create
ambiguity in questions. This ambiguity often contributes to students struggling
with word problems, leading to frequent misinterpretations. This system of deixis
or referencing is of great concern. For example, consider the sentence:
"Shade gave her sister half of her cake, and she was excited." The
question arises: who was excited, Shade or her sister? This lack of clarity can
confuse students and hinder their understanding.
Your reflection is rich and well-structured. I appreciate how you linked the historical discussion of Babylonian “practical” mathematics with your own teaching experiences, especially your ideas about field trips and role-playing as ways to make mathematics more meaningful. You also raised a valuable point about ambiguity in language and how it can hinder students’ understanding of word problems.
ReplyDeleteTo strengthen your response, you might connect your practical suggestions more directly to the central question of whether word problems train methods or foster deeper understanding.