My Interpretation of Time(Assignment for 15th
of September)
While reviewing both articles
(by Michael A. Lombardi & J.J. O'Connor and E.F. Robertson), I was
surprised by how much of our present-day timekeeping is shaped by historical
accidents and practical choices rather than logical reasoning. It is intriguing
to realize that I always thought the categorization of 60 seconds making 1
minute, 60 minutes making 1 hour, 24 hours making a day, and 365/366 days
making a year was universal. However, the articles reveal that these structures
are cultural inventions that became global standards.
Personally, I don’t see time
as a rigid movement dictated by the clock. Instead, I view it as an everyday
pattern of life. Back in Nigeria, a year is fundamentally divided into two
parts: the rainy and the dry season. We plan our lives around these seasons,
determining when farmers should plant and harvest their crops, as well as when
to stay away from the fields. I often realized the importance of time when I
had to navigate the structured educational system and began working with my
certificates.
The inconsistencies in both
articles prompted me to reflect on the fact that while we depend on precise
measurements to coordinate life, our human experiences of time don’t always
align with the clock. For example, the dry season has always seemed longer than
the rainy season due to its significant impact on daily life in Nigeria. When I
arrived in Canada on December 30, 2024, I was greeted by harsh cold, and then I
experienced summer from May to August. Now it feels like we’re quickly heading
back to the cold.
Both articles highlight the
creativity of past civilizations in establishing standard units over time,
while daily living shows that time is also deeply felt through cycles of
weather, school, and light.’
Comments
Post a Comment